• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 11:48:11 +0000

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> writes:

<snip/>, wrt XML Schema

> Elsewhere
> 
> "Although this DTD is non-normative, any XML document which is not valid per
> this DTD, given redefinitions in its internal subset of the 'p' and 's'
> parameter entities below appropriate to its namespace declaration of the XML
> Schema namespace, is almost certainly not a valid schema document, with the
> exception of documents with multiple namespace prefixes for the XML Schema
> namespace itself"
> 
> Having just read another round of "DTDs are Dead and 
> Deserve to Be" in an article prominently quoting 
> a W3C official who is in charge of architectures, 
> why is that there?

1) Just what is it that you think is inappropriate about the above?
2) What 'W3C official' and what article?

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• References:
  • And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XHTML m12n XSD
• Next by Date: Re: Unsuccessful attempts at validating xsd:any
• Previous by thread: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
• Next by thread: RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread