• From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• To: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>, Patrick Lightbody <plightbo@c...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:54:33 -0800

At 10:23 AM 1/19/2001 -0800, Michael Fitzgerald wrote:
>Pat, xlink syntax looks like, as you probably already know:
>
><xl:link xl:href="http://www.foobar.com/mydoc.xml" xl:type="simple"
>xl:show="embed" xl:actuate="onload"/>
>
>where a simple traversal embeds the resource mydoc.xml upon loading the
>document containing the link, where embedding has the effect of an HTML IMG
>element embedding a JPEG (fr'instance) when an application renders the
>document
>
>for show and actuate attribute behaviors see:
>http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/#link-behaviors

         Have you guys thought about using XInclude 
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/)?

--->Ben

• References:
  • RE: XML "include"?
    • From: Patrick Lightbody <plightbo@c...>
  • RE: XML "include"?
    • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is an XML document?
• Next by Date: Re: How could RDDL be internationalised?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML "include"?
• Next by thread: How could RDDL be internationalised?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread