• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:24:06 +0000

Quick followup -- I checked the XLink spec, and it's pretty clear that 

'role' is for properties of the target resource
'arcrole' is for properties of the target wrt to the link

so my/Tim/Jason's proposal, that 'role' be the primary xlink attribute 
we use to distinguish on rddl:resource from another, and 'arcrole' be
the secondary one, seems clearly preferrable to the status quo.

Hope you can see you way to making this change.

th
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>

• References:
  • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Next by Date: Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Next by thread: Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread