• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@a...>
• Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 12:05:00 -0700 (MST)

Besides the other ideas I posted, I thought up "Namespace Gloss" or
"Resource Gloss".

I don't like "* Discovery Directory" since the "discovery" seems
redundant given the "directory".  Looks like just a way to toss in a
buzzword now that DISCO is back in vogue, with new cousin UDDI.

Other ideas: "Resource Charter", "Resource Summary", "Resource Outlay",
"Namespace Resource Directory" (has the requisite three words).

As for your point about mixing FPI catalogues with the namespace
descriptors: agreed.  Luckily, it looks as if everyone has already agreed
not to do so.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@f...               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python

• Prev by Date: Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
• Next by Date: Making Resource Glosses Real (i.e. -> xml.org)
• Previous by thread: Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
• Next by thread: Making Resource Glosses Real (i.e. -> xml.org)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread