• From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>,Paul Grosso <pgrosso@a...>
• Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 19:53:47 +0000

> > > I thought up "Namespace Gloss" or
> > > "Resource Gloss".

I liked XCatalog, but the American spelling isn't very international. It's
bad enough having to spell modularization with a "z" (and that's pronounced
"zed" not "zee").

I like XML Namespace Gloss. XNGloss, or whatever.

> I hope Jonathan, Tim and Sean would have a few
> spare cycles left as well

You bet I have. I look forward to seeing this through 'till the time it
ends up as a W3C Recommendation :-)
Seriously, I think having <link><resource/></link> in a m12n family is the
best way to go... and the details aren't all that hard to sort out: this
thing kind of writes itself.

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF]
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
   - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

• References:
  • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]]
• Next by Date: Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
• Previous by thread: Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
• Next by thread: Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread