• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 15:26:36 -0800

At 03:58 PM 29/12/00 +0800, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@s...>
>> So does this mean you want to formalize what you called the 'lucky dip'
>> earlier this year in regard to URIs, where there may be times when
>> (namespaceURI=schemaURI) works and other times where it doesn't?
>
>No, I think there can still be a convention established with respects the
>different uses.
>For example, the convention could be that dereferencng the namespace URI
>(when it is an http:, at least) results in:
...
>  * some definite kind of directory or resource discovery document, to be
>decided, which allows systematic retrieval of lots of different kinds of
>resource, including links to semantic and structural schemas;

Bingo! -Tim

• References:
  • Re: simple question on namespaces.
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Treaty of Wulai (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Treaty of Wulai (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Begging the Question
• Next by Date: Re: simple question on namespaces.
• Previous by thread: Re: Treaty of Wulai (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
• Next by thread: Re: simple question on namespaces.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread