• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@S...>,xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:04:23 -0600

You might drop a level and inquire into 
generic modes.  It seems to me that mode are
one of the more powerful and simply applied features 
of XSLT, and generalizable.  A TOC is a TOC in the 
abstract.  Modes are fascinating in their own 
right because they are a naming property that seems to 
press on the boundary issues of sharing semantics.

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:Jonathan.Robie@S...]

I suspect that there are probably classes of transformations that are the 
bread and butter transformations used in particular domains. What would be 
a good way to identify a set of such domains and the transformations 
generally used in them?

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Next by Date: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Previous by thread: Re: Visual Transformations: Bread and Butter Transformations?
• Next by thread: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread