• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:51:34 +0100

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> 
> By the way, is it possible to use
> RDF sources to derive topic maps
> where the topic map becomes the compressed
> version (the higher level representation)
> of the rdf assertions?

I *** think *** it is (at least for RDF vocabularies such as RSS 1.0),
but it's something I have just begun to work on and I don't have any
firm conclusions to share yet ;=) ...

Eric

> Len Bullard
> Intergraph Public Safety
> clbullar@i...
> http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
> 
> Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
> Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       Dyomedea                    http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org         http://4xt.org              http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Next by Date: Re: Ugly XML processing looking for a generic XML solution (long)
• Previous by thread: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Next by thread: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread