• From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:18:25 +0000

> yield something containing lots of human-readable explanatory
> text, plus pointers to lots of different machine-readable related
> resources, but I've been saying this for 2 years now and don't
> seem to be winning the argument.

Maybe because that would still involve having a universally recognized
syntax for something that has prose descriptions and links to two machine
readable versions. What's the point of having links to two machine readable
versions if a machine can't find them! And the wheel rolls on...

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF]
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
   - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

• References:
  • Re: simple question on namespaces.
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@q...>
  • Re: simple question on namespaces.
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Bring back src? (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Bring back src? (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
• Next by Date: RE: simple question on namespaces.
• Previous by thread: Re: Bring back src? (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
• Next by thread: RE: Bring back src? (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread