• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• To: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 11:04:38 -0700 (MST)

> You may have found a bug in RDF. If it can't be represented in common
> programming and scripting environments it's going to have a pretty high
> barrier to adoption.
>
> The serialization formats in XML-RPC and SOAP have been proven to work
> across many different environments.
>
> Surely you can model a directed graph in a Java or Perl structure?
>
> If so, then you can use XML-RPC or SOAP serialization.
>
> If not, what's the future of RDF??

I'm sorry, but this sounds like the road to nowhere.  I have no sense
whatsoever that we're even talking about the same matter, so I'll simply
demur.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@f...               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
• Next by Date: Re: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
• Previous by thread: Namespace Definitions: Cracks!
• Next by thread: Re: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread