• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>,XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 16:10:22 -0600

I believe that is "black box" testing.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 4:06 PM
To: W. E. Perry; XML DEV
Subject: Re: Ontologies


At 02:01 PM 19/12/00 -0500, W. E. Perry wrote:
>In fact, aren't we ready to go the whole
>way and acknowledge that the ontologies addressable at the nodes of a
semantic
>web must in fact *be* executable against the various inputs we put to them?


What does that mean?  

I suspect I disagree, but the proposition as
stated has too many potential interpretations. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ontologies
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ontologies
• Next by Date: RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
• Previous by thread: Schema Question: decimal including INF??
• Next by thread: Re: Ontologies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread