• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 22:10:33 +0100

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> 
> Topic Maps are following a path laid
> out by its inventors before RDF existed.
> So, cat out of hat but don't blame the
> cat for that.
> 

I am not blaming anyone --sorry if I gave this impression.

I also wonder if the syntax (RDF, extended XLinks or XTM) is that
important...

The syntax does have an impact on which serialization and
deserialization tools will be used, but the data model is, IMHO, what
really counts.

Eric
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       Dyomedea                    http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org         http://4xt.org              http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Next by Date: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Previous by thread: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Next by thread: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread