• From: "Hodder, Ed" <Ed.Hodder@B...>
• To: 'Ben Sarsgard' <BSarsgard@V...>,"XML-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:09:32 -0500

Yeah, that's interesting. It's definitely not valid XHTML. But transformed
XML doesn't have to be valid anything, does it?

The pages are very different based on the browsers we're using, so at least
the concept of divorced content is being used. There's almost no way short
of asking to find out what's going on behing the scenes, is there?

Ed

> From: Ben Sarsgard [mailto:BSarsgard@V...]

> What's going on there?  It just looks like HTML to me.  
> There's illegal
> characters in the javascript, and the img tags aren't closed. 
>  Am I missing
> something, or did they just take an html document, and save 
> it as .xml?
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Real XML Site
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Real XML Site
• Next by Date: RE: Didier's lab report
• Previous by thread: RE: Real XML Site
• Next by thread: RE: Real XML Site
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread