• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• To: Arjun Ray <aray@q...>
• Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 11:24:40 -0700 (MST)

Thank you *so* much, Arjun, for that telling exchange.  I'm personally +0
on the W3C's archives being opened (not that my vote means S.F.A), and I
understand some need to protect the guilty if it's the only way to make
political companies play standards ball, but It is very useful to have a
brief glance into the archives.

I definitely agree with the party who felt that the NS rec should have
explicitly prohibited resolving the NSRef in order to affect processing.
Not as a perfected solution, but as a better solution than leaving such a
dangerous vacuum. It's a shame this wording never made it.

Ah well, the damage is done.  Onward.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@f...               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python

• Prev by Date: RE: Semantic Web Hackings
• Next by Date: RE: simple question on namespaces.
• Previous by thread: Re: simple question on namespaces.
• Next by thread: Re: simple question on namespaces.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread