[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:33:04 +0000

At 06:05 PM 12/26/2000 -0500, Jonathan Borden wrote:
>Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> >
> > Yes, but it might be interesting to create an 'XPath parser' which reads
>in
> > XPath and spits out SAX events, making these critters a bit easier to
> > process and transform internally.  Then maybe an XPath writer which takes
> > those events and reports them as XPath again.
>
>     So what you want is an XPath grove parser.

What would the grove approach offer that an XML notation approach
would not?

I like the idea of a blessed XML expression of notations that are not
natively XML (XPath, SAX events, MP3:-). Blessing  XML notation
for these allows implementers to implement XML import/export
and allows integrators to join things together using their
XML toolbox for the glue.

Sean


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member