• From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@i...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:25:54 +0000

Paul Tchistopolskii wrote,
> The sad part is that I think Google is good not because it 
> works together with <meta>. I think Google is good  because it 
> *kills* the <meta>-based stuff. Google is utilizing many 
> technologies ( see  [1] and [2] ). Unfortunately, I think all 
> of those technologies are almost orthogonal to markup.

[snip: Goggle using (co)citation]

Why is this sad?

Citation and co-citation work because links are semantically
rich (ie. they reflect the intentions of human authors 
surprisingly well *without* needing complex domain modelling) and 
don't require much cleverness on the part of search engines.

That's surely a win ... unless you think that AI is The Only Way.

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                               InterX
Internet Systems Architect                5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)20 8817 4030                       London, W6 0LJ, England
msabin@i...                         http://www.interx.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web
• Next by Date: Automatic DTD generator
• Previous by thread: Re: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web
• Next by thread: Re: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread