Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
But it can serve as a foundation for a discourse which in process redefines the ontological instance. That is how we evolve a system using standard models as initial conditions. It can be an input and not necessarily, a control. So, no not concrete, but definitely mortar. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] I'd like to suggest system three, where enough creative destruction goes on to permit reinvention where necessary to provide efficient provision of results - and I think that's pretty much what goes on in computing. Some reinvention of the wheel, some learning about inventions. Code bases constantly change, though it may not be visible to users. And only foundations (binary math?) are ever fixed in concrete. For me, ontology can't begin to qualify as a foundation.
|
