• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:46:32 -0500

> Upon further investigation streaming-transformations may turn out to be a
> completely different animal.  When you change some fundamental assumptions
> (like random access in XPath selections) it is wise to revisit the entire
> design.  I also like the idea of throwing in regular expressions while
> you're at it.  (Hey, the Schema guys got away with it -
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#regexs :-)

FWIW. In a streaming environment about all you can count on is a stack
of open elements for context.... but guess what? That, plus a reasonable
event model, plus a reasonably powerful right-hand side, get's about
85% of simply transformations taken care of.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: transformations
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>

• References:
  • RE: transformations
    • From: Chris Lovett <clovett@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ubiquitous XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Transformation
• Previous by thread: Re: transformations
• Next by thread: RE: transformations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread