• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
• To: Mike.Champion@S..., xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:49:19 -0500

<Mike.Champion@S...> asked for a URL:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [SMTP:clbullar@i...]
> > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 9:38 AM
> > To: Brian Killian; xml-dev@l...
> > Subject: RE: xslt
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.  Speed.  Microsoft has published test results
> > showing a speed-up of in some cases seven to one.
> > Stats (as we all know by now) are subject to review.
> >
> Interesting ... Could anyone supply a pointer to these
results?
>

http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml/articles/xml03202000.asp

Cheers,

Tom Passin

• References:
  • RE: xslt
    • From: Mike.Champion@S...

• Prev by Date: Re: Dangers of Subsetting? (was RE: Pull-based XML parsers?)
• Next by Date: Re: Why not canonical parsers? [Was: Pull-based XML parsers? ]
• Previous by thread: RE: xslt
• Next by thread: Re: xslt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread