• From: Toby Speight <streapadair@g...>
• To: XML developers' list <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:53:35 +0000

0> In article <3A0F8A28.D96A5310@g...>,
0> Rick JELLIFFE <URL:mailto:ricko@g...> ("Rick") wrote:

Rick> In SGML, you have a richer variety of entity declarations
Rick> mechanisms that might allow you to do something.  In SGML, you
Rick> would probably rewrite the storage manager to allow reading
Rick> entities from standard input; some SGML systems allowed this.
Rick> You could hack the storage manager for your XML processor,
Rick> make up some home-made convention for accessing standard input
Rick> etc.

No hacking or home-made conventions required if you're using the SP
toolset (which handles XML as easily as any other kind of SGML).  A
formal system identifier (FSI) for standard input looks like "<osfd>0".

If you have several values to pass in, you'll need some way of
marshalling them - the usual way is to make the input be a DTD
subset, and forming it as a set of entity declarations.

-- 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: User passed Arguments for Entities
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
  • Re: User passed Arguments for Entities
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>

• References:
  • User passed Arguments for Entities
    • From: Saravanan Ramaswamy <rsaravan@c...>
  • Re: User passed Arguments for Entities
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and Schemes
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces and Schemes
• Previous by thread: Re: User passed Arguments for Entities
• Next by thread: Re: User passed Arguments for Entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread