• From: Sean McGrath <sean@d...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:25:20 +0000

At 12:56 PM 11/10/00 -0500, Jonathan Borden wrote:

> >What is important is that we all agree on what XML 1.0 is, and given its
> >precise specification I think there is precious little room for argument
> >regarding this.

SGML was precisely specified. XML is precisely specifed.

Here is a precise statement:
         "XML parsers may or may not whistle Dixie".

A precise statement of an optional behaviour in a data
notation specification is an ambiguity at the
data interoperability level.

regards,

Sean McGrath
CTO
Propylon - Enabling Universal Mobility
http://www.propylon.com
Tel: +353 1 6620482

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Options in XML 1.0
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Options in XML 1.0
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Options in XML 1.0
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Options in XML 1.0
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Options in XML 1.0
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Options in XML 1.0
• Next by Date: Re: Options in XML 1.0
• Previous by thread: Re: Options in XML 1.0
• Next by thread: Re: Options in XML 1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread