Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Hanson, Jon" wrote: > > then such expressions would not be valid xml, so you can't really write a > DTD for them. > an XML equivalent of what you appear to be attempting might be something > like:- > > <lambda> > <name>fred</name> > <body>xyz</body> > </lambda> If you're trying to express a DTD-constrained lisp grammar in XML, that's probably the approach to take. SGML, by virtue of its configurable concrete syntax, lets you get a bit closer to the original lisp syntax. I would never recommend that anybody actually use this for anything, but you can find a toy example of lisp-in-SGML at: http://www.blnz.com/lml/ Enjoy, Bill
|
