Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > > Eric van der Vlist raised some issues [1] with the recent working draft of > 'Syntax of CSS rules in HTML's "STYLE" attribute' [2]. HTML, XHTML, SVG, > and MathML all use this 'style' attribute. > I see this as something that will happen more and more frequently and not only within vocabularies defined by the W3C ;=) ... There is a lot of overlap between vocabularies that have been defined independently and it would often make sense to create new modules to isolate the common feature and reduce the overlaps. I should have thought about it before W3C XML Schema is CR :( but after reading the XLink remapping document, I wonder if a feature to define "synonyms" wouldn't have been useful. To be able to say: "consider @href and @xlink:href as equivalent" or "consider @style and @css:style as equivalent" or "consider @base and @xml:base as equivalent" or "consider @lang and @xml:lang as equivalent" would solve many issues... Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
