• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:52:01 -0400

> Everything else in the W3C other than DOM has been 
> bogged down and taking forever. 
>
> A non-W3C effort that has been miraculous has been 
> SAX and SAX-2.

Both of these efforts, as I noted, are also influenced
by previous experience. Actually, SVG might be another
for the list of rapidly developed specs, and for the
same reasons.

For speed of development and general coherency of a 
standard, shared understanding and shared goals are
invaluable.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Good Standards Writers Steal
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development
    • From: Danny Vint <dvint@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development
• Next by Date: Sun StarOffice XML File Format
• Previous by thread: Re: Will XML change the character of W3C? Was: Re: sunshine andstandards development
• Next by thread: Good Standards Writers Steal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread