• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:22:29 -0500 (EST)

Daniel Barclay writes:

 > > Architectural Forms would be ...
 > 
 > Is there any clear, simple explanation of what Architectural Forms
 > are out there?  (Whatever I've encountered so far hasn't been clear
 > enough to click.)

If you have to ask, you're not ready to know yet.

Seriously, over two years ago, I put an architectural-form proposal
together for XML and called it "XAF".  The response was un-deafening,
and I think that the ISO people came up with a slightly different
syntax in the end, but the tutorial material is still available for
historical interest:

  http://www.megginson.com/XAF/


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
    • From: Daniel Barclay <Daniel.Barclay@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: RE: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread