• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:00:25 -0500

The statement is debatable.  SAX is oriented to 
the events the infoSet describes.  This is one 
level out from "application vocabularies" so 
one can say it is infrastructure.  It is not 
necessarily "network infrastructure" but this  
may be slicing thin.

As I watch this thread, I am beginning to think 
OASIS may be the better candidate.  At least 
in the notion that SAX is a markup API, OASIS 
is a markup standards organization.

Does anyone else have some reasons why OASIS 
would or would not be a good org to own the 
SAX record of authority?

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: John Evdemon [mailto:john.evdemon@x...]

Problem: SAX is really applications-oriented, not infrastructure.  Would
IETF even be interested in this?

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?
    • From: Karl Best <karl.best@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by Date: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Previous by thread: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by thread: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread