Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I agree that this is an excellent model for future spec work.
I would love to see something like this coming out of the W3C.
You could have:
/*!-- the actual specs released --*/
Spec.xml (normative)
SpecCommentary.xml (informative, approved by WG)
SpecEditorsNotes.xml (non-normative, approved only by the Editor)
/*!-- some standard stylesheets, used by multiple WGs --*/
Browser_View.xsl
Print_Normative_Only.xsl
Print_As_Gloss.xsl
Print_As_Footnotes.xsl
/*!-- Rather short files to point your browser at for different views.
Pretty much just identifies the Source Doc, and has a list of
Modifying Docs. --*/
View_Spec.html
View_Spec+Commentary.html
View_Spec+Notes.html
View_Spec+Commentary+Notes.html
It would then be trivial for me to pass around
"Waynes_private_comments_on_spec.xml" to my friends, who could view it the
same way.
Tim Bray did pretty close to that about, what, 2.5 years ago?
And he didn't even have XSLT.
-Wayne Steele
>From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@b...>
...
>Another idea could be to have the informative
>docs in the form of explanatory comments on the actual spec document, like
>Tim Bray's Annotated XML.
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
|
