• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 06:53:20 -0400 (EDT)

Eric van der Vlist writes:

 > I begin to think that XML vocabularies should take example on XML
 > itself and that when designing a vocabulary one should start by
 > defining the infoset (the data model), a canonical form (a very
 > strict syntax) before defining one (or more if needed) "user XML
 > syntax(es)" and canonization algorithms with reference
 > implementation(s).

I know that people hate this distinction, but for data-oriented XML, I
agree that the data model should be designed first, independently of
XML.  For document-oriented XML, on the other hand, the XML markup
often is the model.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• References:
  • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Must DTDs constrain order?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DNS problems
• Next by Date: duplicate messages
• Previous by thread: Re: Must DTDs constrain order?
• Next by thread: Re: Must DTDs constrain order?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread