• From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>
• To: David DS Barnes <d.d.barnes@i...>
• Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:54:09 +0800

David DS Barnes wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> with all this talk of
> company A's ml
> company B's ml
> and conversions therewith, 8)
> has anybody been working on
> XAC
> or, if it doesn't exist yet:
> 'eXtensible Agent Communications'
> an ml for robots/agents/etc
> which is some kind of rule-set
> for their communication
> like some on-the-fly contract ...
> 
> any takers/makers?
 
If you are looking for an XML language which provides
rule-based checking that an XML file is consistent with
some constraints detectable in another XML file, and which
has been designed with a view to allowing distributed agents,
check out  consistencyChecker from  consistencycheck.com

It is quite similar to Schematron, but is more powerful
at the area of distributed-document consistency checking and a
different expression language.

Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Re: More Stupid XML Articles
    • From: Dmitri Pavlenkov <dmitripavlenkov@y...>
  • Dvo WAS: Stupid XML Articles
    • From: David DS Barnes <d.d.barnes@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Is it possible require an element contain*non-whitespace* characters.
• Next by Date: Re: XML, 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Dvo WAS: Stupid XML Articles
• Next by thread: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XMLArticles))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread