• From: John Evdemon <john.evdemon@x...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 17:14:33 -0400

On Wednesday, October 04, 2000 at 16:11, Simon St.Laurent wrote :

> Apache's still an option, but OASIS looks good.

I would much rather see OASIS maintain SAX than Apache.  There may be some potential 
vendor concerns with Apache (as others have already mentioned).  

John Evdemon
Chief Architect
XMLSolutions
http://www.xmls.com
http://www.xedi.org

• References:
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XML Articles)
• Next by Date: It is Pretty Dumb (Was RE: Not so stupid (was re: More Stupid XMLArticles))
• Previous by thread: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by thread: Re: Who will maintain SAX?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread