• From: Bill dehOra <wdehora@c...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 15:47:53 +0100

>He's not saying that it should be taken on by W3C to be beefed 
>up to be like
>DOM.  He's saying that it would be nice for there to be a W3C 
>standard like
>SAX to compliment the features of DOM.  After all, SAX is an 
>ideal choice
>for building the DOM.  SAX should be left as it is, and I 
>think that most
>people (the W3C especially) understand that.


The W3C aren't ostensibly in the API space: the DOM is a single exception to
that case. I can't see the w3c going any further down that road.

SAX sounds like it belongs on something like sourceforge or just kept on
xml-dev as a ding in sich. Someone will volunteer as benign dictator surely?
Otherwise it will go into commitee with voting and charters and ... yawn.

-Bill de hÓra

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Who will maintain SAX?
    • From: Dave Pawson <daveP@d...>
  • Re: Who will maintain SAX?
    • From: Michael Champion <mike.champion@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by Date: deriving by restriction
• Previous by thread: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by thread: Re: Who will maintain SAX?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread