Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...> > ...or does the payload ratio - payload being technical content of > interest to XML developers, in their role as developers - seem kind > of low around here these days? Until recently, I hadn't been in the > habit of deleting dozens of xml-dev postings at a time, unread. -Tim Do I understand right this means you can point me to some W3C document describing the design of the new 'semantics' web? Maybe there is some paper that answers a simple questions like : - The semantics web is : ... ? - Current web is built with CGI , HTTP and HTML ( that's why it is not 'semantics Web'). - To get 'semantics Web' we will layer the protocol x... on HTTP ( or : we will replace HTTP with the protocol x... ) - XSLT is not supposed to be used for anything but rendering to XSL FO. e t.c. Rgds.Paul. PS. I found some letters from this 'thread' to be extremely useful and interesting from technical point of view, because for the first time I see some interesting attempts to concentrate on understanding what is XML 'invention' about and how did we got the situation that we have. And what to expect. I'm very glad some people shared their memories and views. PPS. Anyway there was no traffic for a while.
|
