• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Mike Brown <mbrown@c...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:04:23 -0400

Mike Brown wrote:

> Should applications only recognize xml:space as xml:space,

Yes.

> or would
> it be correct to also recognize foo:space, if the foo prefix is
> bound to 'http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace'?

No.  The "xml" prefix gets a namespace as a matter of convenience,
but is itself magic.  To assume otherwise would hurt interoperability.
The same is true of the "xmlns" prefix.

-- 
There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• References:
  • foo:space instead of xml:space?
    • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Must DTDs constrain order?
• Next by Date: Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?
• Previous by thread: foo:space instead of xml:space?
• Next by thread: Re: foo:space instead of xml:space?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread