Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 06:24 PM 10/16/00 -0400, Jonathan.Robie@S... wrote: > > The W3C Process Document, which outlines the process used in the W3C, says > that Working Drafts must be produced every 3 months to keep the public > informed: > > <snip > source="<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Process-19991111/>http://www > .w3.org/Consortium/Process/Process-19991111/"> > At least every three months, a Working Group must publish a (public) Working > Draft to keep the community abreast of its progress and to prompt the Working > Group to resolve issues in a timely fashion. The first public Working Draft > (or release of the document for review beyond the Working Group) must be > approved by the Director. > > </snip> > > If the public is no more than 3 months behind the members, that doesn't seem > all that egregrious to me. If that were followed religiously, or even regularly, I'd be a much happier XHTML developer. However, we've still got: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xhtml11-20000105 We're at about 9.5 months on that one, and I wish I could report that it was a deeply unusual case. Sometimes just sticking to the rules would help though, certainly! Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
