• From: John Evdemon <john.evdemon@x...>
• To: "'johnston.p@w...'" <johnston.p@w...>,"'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:47:00 -0400

Any chance of getting IETF interested in SAX?  There are several advantages:
   1) No fees
   2) Open to anyone
   3) Neutral standards body (no risk of alienating vendors e.g. Apache)

Problem: SAX is really applications-oriented, not infrastructure.  Would
IETF even be interested in this?


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Johnston <johnston.p@w...>
To: xml-dev@l... <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Mon Oct 02 16:13:54 2000
Subject: Re: Who will maintain SAX?

I'm not sure I understand throughout this discussion what the role of the
SAX maintainer would be.  It seems like SAX is a static entity---new
features seem to come not in the form of changes to SAX itself, but as new
entities (SAX2, for example).  Does 'SAX' really *need* a maintainer?

Naively,
Paul

• Prev by Date: Re: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by Date: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Previous by thread: Re: Who will maintain SAX?
• Next by thread: RE: Who will maintain SAX?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread