• From: Tim McCune <timm@c...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 12:49:16 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The same way you would deprecate a method in Java.  Sorry, I didn't
consider the non-programmers here.

- -----Original Message-----
From: Peter S. Housel [mailto:housel@h...]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 12:12 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Deprecating XSLT templates


Tim McCune <timm@c...> wrote:
> The subject line sort of says it all.  Has anyone given any thought
> to this?  The only thing we've come up with so far is sticking some
> <xsl:message>s in them.

I can't make heads or tails out of the subject line.  Do you want to
"express disapproval of", "play down", or "disparage" XSLT templates?
 Are
you trying to compute your income taxes, and need to "lower their
price or
estimated value"?

Cheers,
- -Peter S. Housel-   housel@a...   http://members.home.com/housel/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBOdzMfNUPOr8a7vy5EQJhzgCdG2eJyyQRH9yffqf3aIGfknFqKNsAoP+o
/HL2ssQceMPE9ZPdeUXxPNDb
=niWF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Deprecating XSLT templates
    • From: Evan Lenz <elenz@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Deprecating XSLT templates
• Next by Date: Re: The failure to communicate XML - and its costs to e-business
• Previous by thread: Re: Deprecating XSLT templates
• Next by thread: RE: Deprecating XSLT templates
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread