• From: Jonathan.Robie@S...
• To: amyzing@t..., cce@c..., xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:21:50 -0400

Amy Lewis wrote:

> Another view:
>
> 1) require that a candidate recommendation be accompanied by a
> conformance-determining test suite (hah!  eXtreme Specifying,
> anyone?)
> 2) since W3C wishes to remain a vendor forum, adopt the
> principles of other vendor coalitions: no recommendation
> may *leave* candidate status until two member organizations
> have produced conformant (see 1), interoperable implementations.

Yep. I would certainly be in favor of that.

Jonathan

• Prev by Date: RE: sunshine and standards development
• Next by Date: Widening Circles
• Previous by thread: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
• Next by thread: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread