• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• To: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:29:23 +0100

Rick JELLIFFE wrote:
> 
...
> , but on the
> other hand the participants do have very definite use-cases that
> they do want to support, and which RELAX or Schematron do not.

Have these use cases been published? For me the key element of
difficulty reading the part 1 spec is that it appears to be a complex
solution that has been abstracted out from the a lot of the problems it
is designed to solve. Technical specs are like novels, understanding
motivations casts light on everything.

Francis.
-- 
Francis Norton.

Defy Convention? Deify Convention!

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Proliferation of validation options
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>

• References:
  • Proliferation of validation options
    • From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
  • Re: Proliferation of validation options
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: checking regular expressions in patterns
• Next by Date: Re: Proliferation of validation options
• Previous by thread: Re: Proliferation of validation options
• Next by thread: Re: Proliferation of validation options
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread