Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jonathan Borden wrote: > I have no problem with what the Infoset is trying to accomplish as a subset > of XML 1.0 + Names (just as I have no problem with what Common XML etc are > trying to accomplish), but this activity needs to come from a complete base > down to X,Y or Z subset each of which are useful. "Needs to" = "must", and there is no "must" about it. It "may" be done that way, and it *has* been done that way. I have no interest in recreating the SGML Property Set, nor even an XML-specific ultra-low-level property set. As I said, those who want the former know where to get it, and those who want the latter now know where to get it too. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
|
