• From: Sean McGrath <sean@d...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 15:17:38 +0100

At 08:45 01/08/00 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>Sounds like a grove plan to me.
>

Yes, but we need to jettison the other umpteen layers of abstraction
in the grove stuff that keep this simple idea from
sprouting wings!

Sean

>Len Bullard
>Intergraph Public Safety
>clbullar@i...
>http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
>
>Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
>Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...]
>
>For example, I might create a subset which equates either single or double
>quotes around attribute values. Or I may wish to view the logical document
>model with expanded entities. But we all have a base from which to make
>these pruning decisions.
>
>I'd prefer this. No red herring.
>
>
http://www.pyxie.org - an Open Source XML Processing library for Python

• References:
  • RE: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Its the semantics dummy :-)
• Next by Date: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why the Infoset?
• Next by thread: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread