• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Michael Rossi <mrossi@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 10:36:19 -0500

Thanks Michael.

Unless one has the version attribute (and you do), then 
considering it an identifier (a unique name) is dangerous 
for fielding versioned applications, yes?  IOW, it 
becomes a managed entity to ensure local versions 
are the versions to which the application was built.  

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Rossi [mailto:mrossi@c...]

	Given that the namespace spec only ever intended to "identify",
rather than "locate", I choose the latter interpretation. And based on this
interpretation, it seems to me that my namespace can remain constant across
versions of my spec (as a single instance can't contain more than one
version of it).

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespace and Versioning
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace and Versioning
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace and Versioning
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace and Versioning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread