• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@i...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 13:03:19 -0400

Kay Michael wrote:

> We now have the perverse situation that the core infoset of a
> document does not contain enough information to generate its canonical form,
> and the canonical form does not contain enough information to generate its
> core infoset.

Don't assume that Canonical XML is "the" canonical form.  It is a specialized
form suitable for digital signatures, and perhaps for little else.  It is
not equivalent to normalized XML in concept.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

• References:
  • RE: Why the Infoset?
    • From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Recursive Children?
• Next by Date: RE: XML in Office 200X
• Previous by thread: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Next by thread: RE: Why the Infoset?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread