• From: james anderson <james.anderson@m...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:30:02 +0200

sorry about the omission.

james anderson wrote:
> ...
> > Please note that people can design their own XML update language in
> > conjunction with the OpenXML XML rowset provider inside T-SQL stored
> > procedures.
> >
> 
> i was wondering 'cause i had done an update mechanism against an object
> database and found (for the large object case which im mentioned in the
> previous message) 

that content based updates were difficult, if not intractable, and

> ended up using path-based adressing...

[and, in any case, the user agent was tracking pointer information for
undo/redo use anyway]

• References:
  • RE: updategrams
    • From: Michael Rys <mrys@m...>
  • Re: updategrams
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Identity mapping with XSLT
• Next by Date: Re: Does DTD validation work with namespaces?
• Previous by thread: Re: updategrams
• Next by thread: Re: updategrams
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread