• From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@m...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:54:05 -0700

> Ok for messaging and again, for central standards shared
> across the uberSystem.  Probably not so
> good for database management of applications hosted on that system.

Why isn't it an advantage to have a single URI instead of a (URI,
version-number) tuple for the envelope as well as for any "application"
which can live within a SOAP message?

> This is a juicy topic for those who like distributed chaos
> and systems
> that run best on the edge of turbulence.

Naming is always juicy, no?

Henrik

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Lexus: a XML Update Language
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace and Versioning
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace and Versioning
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace and Versioning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread