• From: Oliver Becker <obecker@i...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 14:59:03 +0200 (MET DST)

> I think the bigger problem is that people are seeing "http" and assume that
> something is being retrieved. A Namespace URI simply provides a unique value
> to help avoid issues caused by duplicate element and attribute names across
> disparate markups (Namespace collisions).  

Looking at the namespace rec, it says:
"An XML namespace is a collection of names, identified by a URI reference ..."

There's no need to use http-URLs.
Perhaps it's a good idea to define a new adressing scheme which means: 
This is a namespace. (There is nothing to retrieve.)

Something like
ns://w3.org

The namespace recommendation doesn't have to change this way.
(Perhaps the examples ...)

Best regards,
Oliver

PS: Don't know the discussion on xml-uri ...


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/
[2] http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes

/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
|  ob|do        Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker                             |
|  --+--        E-Mail: obecker@i...             |
|  op|qo        WWW:    http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace Question
• Next by Date: RE: Namespace Question
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespace Question
• Next by thread: RE: Namespace Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread