• From: "Michael S. Brothers" <Michael.S.Brothers@E...>
• To: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@c...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 15:52:40 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)

Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

> and is this regarded as a good thing, then? hands up all those who
> think that the truly amazing amount of information on the web is
> balanced by the utter uselessness and wrongness of most of it :-}

I can't see where value judgements enter into this debate. Will FO's 
solve the problem? Maybe a better question--is there a problem 
screaming out for this, or any, solution?

Take Care,
mike brothers
-----------------------------------------
Michael S. Brothers
515-362-7473
"So you tried and you failed miserably.
Son, the lesson here is...Never try. 
-Homer Simpson


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The problem with typography (with or without flow objects)
    • From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@c...>

• References:
  • Re: The problem with typography (with or without flow objects)
    • From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A or An
• Next by Date: RE: A or An
• Previous by thread: Re: The problem with typography (with or without flow objects)
• Next by thread: Re: The problem with typography (with or without flow objects)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread