[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • To: xml-dev@x...
  • Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 19:01:48 +0100

At 11:04 AM 6/8/00 -0400, Albert Bupp wrote:
>Greetings Folks,
>
>Can someone please briefly outline which parsers, if any, currently (or in
>the near future will) support validation for schema syntaxes other than the
>DTD syntax? Or is it expected that applications will themselves have to
>implement this validation?
>
>My apologies if this represents an irritating newbie question.

Not in the slightest! Questions like this have several spinoffs:
	- they refresh the memories of people like me.
	- they often spark off fundamental discussions of real value
	- they catalyse the community into action - to generate tools where no
tools existed before. Or to revitalise interest. Thus I strongly support
the XSL-FO effort - see separate thread.

I have been very pleased to the see the recent flux of "newbie" questions -
many are deeper than they look. 

	P.

Peter Murray-Rust. (CML, VHG and XML-DEV)
CMLC and VirtualXML ConCourse: http://www.cmlconsulting.com/
CML http://www.xml-cml.org/
Virtual HyperGlossary http://www.vhg.org.uk/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member