• From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@c...>
• To: peter@u...
• Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 00:32:31 +0100 (BST)

Peter Murray-Rust writes:
 > I particularly agree with the last two goals FOP is already almost usable
 > for some purposes - Michael Wright - working with Henry Rzepa has written a
 > 60 page thesis in XML (about, and featuring, CML], transformed to XSL-FO
 > and rendered (in print) with FOP. 

I'd be interested to see a comparison between this 60 page document
rendered with XSLFO/FOP, and the same document rendered using
XML+CSS, and a good browser's print engine. 

 >It looks very attractive and (IMO) no
 > less presentable than many Word documents.

if `as good as Word' is the target, then the XSL FO team are *way* out
of line in their work :-}

Sebastian Rahtz


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: FOs again
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• References:
  • FOs again
    • From: Amy Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: FOs again
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: FOs again
• Next by Date: Re: control characters
• Previous by thread: Re: FOs again
• Next by thread: Re: FOs again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread