Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
However, if we wish to alter their behavior, one recourse is to provide the definitive test that enables one to discover that their implementation is aberrant. In that way, systems that must inteoperate play tit for tat and on detecting bad behavior, route around it to look for an alternative service. MIT and other Kerberos community officials document the non-interoperability of the implementation and give it a low rating. I agree completely about base services. It is a problem everywhere I look in XML languages particularly those that are being re-represented in so called supersets. We've discussed this before as the contract for behavioral fidelity and how that contract has to be testably expressed in the standards language. Simplistic, I realize, but I think you get the point. Children that play well together are rewarded and those that don't go to time out. Len Bullard Intergraph Public Safety clbullar@i... http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...] In the XML community, particularly for the SAX protocol, the xml-dev list sets standards of behavior. Perhaps we define simply 'not playing nice with the other children' as what was done wrong. *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
