• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:37:50 -0500

If the relationships designer was used instead 
of a just the table designer, then on second 
thought, yes there is sufficient information 
there to get foreign keys, etc.  Required 
fields might still require some dump from 
the form objects or the code.  Hmm.. More 
investigation.

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Sharp [mailto:msharp@l...]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 12:43 PM
To: xml-dev@x...
Subject: Re: SQL Schema to XML Schema generator [any out there?]




Yes, this is how we do it here.  On one project, at least, we're using a
code
generator for the object layer that gets the ERD using ODBC (just like the
one
produced by ErWin), and generates all the base object classes, including FK
relationships.  We "turn off" those that we're not interested in, and how it
does it, I have no idea (I'm just a lowly UI developer)!  But it works well
as a
starting point!

regards,
Mike Sharp



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft's Universal Canvas
• Next by Date: RE: British Telecom owns Hyperlink?
• Previous by thread: Re: SQL Schema to XML Schema generator [any out there?]
• Next by thread: Why XML over ASN Today (WAS RE: Another Question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread